US v. Paulk, No. 08-5022924 June 2009, 2:33 pmDefendant's drug possession sentence is affirmed, where Defendant was sentenced pursuant to a statutory mandatory minimum, and thus could not be entitled to a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2).
Read US v. Paulk, No. 08-50229
Appellate Information
Submitted February 2, 2009
Filed June 24, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam
Counsel
For Appellant:
Carlton F. Gunn, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
For Appellee:
Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA
Source: FindLaw Opinion Summaries - 9th Circuit COAIf you have a question concerning any legal matter, please give us a call at (518) 465-2211 or visit our main site at
www.randallkehoelaw.com.
